DNA Anwar dijumpa merata, DNA ke 3 hanya 1 lokus

DNA ke 3 yang tidak diketahui itu adalah benda biasa. Tan Sri Shafee tidak tahu dan pelbagai kemungkinan. Maka saja dia katakan mungkin Saiful terkutik DNA itu dari duduk atas tandas atau apa-apa kemungkinan.

Rafizi mengambil peluang untuk mereka isu dan begitu juga peguam-peguam anwar.

CUba kita baca kembali apa yang Shafee katakan:

  Jam 1040: LFL: Shafee - unfair to say entire football team have been to Saiful s anus just because of presence of unidentified 3rd party DNA.

Shafee - 3rd party DNA in Saiful's rectum could also be explained by the fact that he sat on the toilet seat.

Mkini;

 10.40am: Shafee says Male Y is Anwar.

The peri-anal area of Saiful was obtained, where Male Y and another male contributor were found. Shafee says he will explain about the other male contributor later.

Shafee says chemist Noraidora Saedon testified that the DNA swab from the toothbrush  corroborated with that of Male Y.

Justice Arifin asks whether the unidentified male was only found in the peri-anal swab and Shafee replies in the affirmative.

He says the allele 18 was only in sperm extract in low rectal b9.

"What the chemist says appears in one locus (18 allele) and we ignored it," he adds.

 10.55am: Shafee says Anwar and Saiful’s DNA were found on the latter's grey underwear.

The prosecutor says in the peri-anal swab from Saiful, Anwar and Saiful's DNA were present from "top to bottom".

He adds that Anwar’s DNA was also found on the high rectal non-sperm extract.

"It is on every locus," he said.

Shafee explains the third person could have been as a result of Saiful sitting on a toilet seat.

11am: Shafee says there is no third person according to (chemist) Seah as it (the 18 allele) is considered a dropping.

----------------

Jelas sekali DNA pihak ke 3 itu hanya dijumpai di satu tempat (one locus) manakala DNA Anwar dijumpai di merata locus yang diuji.

Dalam ujikimia, memang biasa dalam analisa atau experimen akan terjumpa reading yang lain atau by product kimia dari tindak balas yang tak diharapkan.

Yang penting adakah ianya signifikan atau tidak.

Oleh itu ....sudahlah Rafizi!