1.18 tengahari: Peguambela Anwar Ibrahim, Gopal Sri Ram telah memulahkan dengan merayu supaya hukuman Anwar Ibrahim dipendekkan kepada tempoh 2 tahun sahaja.
Beliau berhujah dengan alasan Anwar Ibrahim bekas pemimpin kerajaan dan juga merupakan Ketua Pembangkang. Gopal juga menyatakan faktor usia dan kesihatan Anwar Ibrahim.
1.31 tengahari: Gopal menyatakan bahawa tiada alasan yang cukup untuk memanjangkan hukuman terhadap Anwar Ibrahim berdasarkan fakta kes.
1.34 tengahari: Shafee pula menyatakan bahawa Anwar Ibrahim perlu mendapat hukuman penjara maksimum 20 tahun tetapi sebatan tidak perlu kerana faktor usia.
Ini adalah kesalahan yang kedua beliau dan kesan daripada kes ini memberikan impak kepada mental dan masa depan Saiful Bukhari. Malah kes Anwar Ibrahim hendak menyaman Saiful Bukhari juga ditarik balik oleh Anwar sendiri.
Shafee turut merujuk kepada kes Datuk Harun yang sebelum ini tidak mendapat pengurangan dari pihak mahkamah walaupun beliau merupakan bekas pemimpin kerajaan.
1.40 tengahari: Shafee turut menyatakan bahawa Mahkamah melakukan kesalahan serius sekiranya meletakkan kesalahan tersebut kurang daripada 6 tahun. Sepatutnya kesalahan kali kedua ini perlu dihukum dengan lebih keras dan berpatutan dengan keputusan mahkamah seluruh dunia.
1.42 tengahari: Pihak hakim bersetuju untuk membenarkan Anwar memberikan kenyataan kepada mahkamah. Malangnya, Anwar Ibrahim menggunakan peluang tersebut untuk menyatakan bahawa ini adalah konspirasi besar untuk menjatuhkan beliau.
Hakim meminta Anwar Ibrahim untuk berhenti, namun beliau masih meneruskan insiden itu dengan menuduh mahkamah pula terlibat dengan konspirasi tersebut.
Hakim mengambil keputusan untuk meninggalkan kamar mahkamah kerana Anwar Ibrahim gagal untuk mematuhi arahan hakim.
Anwar Ibrahim kemudian menjerit di dalam kamar mahkamah menyatakan bahawa beliau tidak akan berhenti untuk memperjuangkan nasibnya.
Sah dia meroyan aku PM! AKu PM! Macam orang gila ....
Berikut adalah nota yang diterima tentang kes ini.
Prosecution led by Tan Sri Dato Seri Dr Muhammad Shafee Abdullah
Defence led by Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram
Chief Justice Tun Ariffin:
1) Saiful Bukhari found to be credible witness
2) No impeachment of Saiful B's evidence
3) There were corroborative evidence to support Saiful B evidence (cctv recording, DNA evidence of Anwar, medical experts, lubricant KY used, no scar or tears in Saiful's anus etc)
4) On DNA evidence, Anwar used the items retrieved from lockup he stayed overnight for DNA profiling.
5) DNA of Anwar was not illegally obtained. Even if it was, in law, it was admissible.
6) DNA profiling shows Anwar sodomised Saiful B.
7) DNA evidence by prosecution corroborates Saiful's testimony on factum of penetration.
8) DNA evidence was not compromised. No contamination of DNA samples.
9) There is no break in chain of custody. Integrity of samples was not compromised.
10) Defence argument that Anwar's DNA was planted was not sustainable.
11) DNA profile Male Y is Anwar's.
12) Sperm heads observed without tails consistent with Saiful's evidence that he was sodomised few days ago before examination was conducted on Safiul's anus.
13) Prosecution medical/ DNA experts found to be credible.
14) On Anwar's defence of alibi, Anwar submitted 13 alibi witnesses but abandoned it later. In Anwar's unsworn statement, he merely said 'it never happened' Anwar never denied sodomising Saiful.
15) Unsworn statement by Anwar was of little value as it was not tested through cross examination.
16) On political conspiracy raised by Anwar, it was not substantiated by any evidence.
17) Anwar never disputed he was there at the same condominium. He was seen entering car park, elevator etc.
18) High Court judge was wrong in acquitting Anwar. High Court imposed 100% test of burden, which was too high.
19) Defence medical experts evidence rejected. They never carried out any practical tests.
20) Compelling evidence ie DNA establish sperm cells of Anwar in Saiful's anus. Anwar failed to cast any reasonable doubt. Prosecution therefore establishes it's case beyond reasonable doubt.
Anwar's appeal dismissed.
(Maklumat dari Whats App)
Defence led by Datuk Seri Gopal Sri Ram
Chief Justice Tun Ariffin:
1) Saiful Bukhari found to be credible witness
2) No impeachment of Saiful B's evidence
3) There were corroborative evidence to support Saiful B evidence (cctv recording, DNA evidence of Anwar, medical experts, lubricant KY used, no scar or tears in Saiful's anus etc)
4) On DNA evidence, Anwar used the items retrieved from lockup he stayed overnight for DNA profiling.
5) DNA of Anwar was not illegally obtained. Even if it was, in law, it was admissible.
6) DNA profiling shows Anwar sodomised Saiful B.
7) DNA evidence by prosecution corroborates Saiful's testimony on factum of penetration.
8) DNA evidence was not compromised. No contamination of DNA samples.
9) There is no break in chain of custody. Integrity of samples was not compromised.
10) Defence argument that Anwar's DNA was planted was not sustainable.
11) DNA profile Male Y is Anwar's.
12) Sperm heads observed without tails consistent with Saiful's evidence that he was sodomised few days ago before examination was conducted on Safiul's anus.
13) Prosecution medical/ DNA experts found to be credible.
14) On Anwar's defence of alibi, Anwar submitted 13 alibi witnesses but abandoned it later. In Anwar's unsworn statement, he merely said 'it never happened' Anwar never denied sodomising Saiful.
15) Unsworn statement by Anwar was of little value as it was not tested through cross examination.
16) On political conspiracy raised by Anwar, it was not substantiated by any evidence.
17) Anwar never disputed he was there at the same condominium. He was seen entering car park, elevator etc.
18) High Court judge was wrong in acquitting Anwar. High Court imposed 100% test of burden, which was too high.
19) Defence medical experts evidence rejected. They never carried out any practical tests.
20) Compelling evidence ie DNA establish sperm cells of Anwar in Saiful's anus. Anwar failed to cast any reasonable doubt. Prosecution therefore establishes it's case beyond reasonable doubt.
Anwar's appeal dismissed.
(Maklumat dari Whats App)
Itulah hakikatnya Nurul.
Janganlah nangis ye ... cantik ko bila nangis.Macam penari k POP pakai tudung
No comments:
Post a Comment